Dan Gibson (author)

Dan Gibson
Born1956[1]
NationalityCanadian
Known forIslamic Revisionism

Daniel Gibson is a Canadian author studying the early history of Arabia and Islam. He is the author of Early Islamic Qiblas: A survey of mosques built between 1AH/622 C.E. and 263 AH/876 C.E, which advances the claim that early mosques were oriented towards Petra, rather than towards Mecca or Jerusalem as traditionally accepted by archaeologists and historians of Islam.[2] His books are self-published, some through CanBooks and others through Independent Scholars Press, an imprint of CanBooks.[3]

The Petra Thesis

According to Gibson, the orientation of mosques built in the early Islamic period does not fit the contemporary direction of prayer in Islam, the Qibla. Historians like David A. King dispute this, saying that astronomical and other factors determined the Qibla in this period. According to Gibson, 17 early mosques point towards the site of Petra which he claims to be intentional. Gibson says that the origin of Islam must have been in Petra, rather than Mecca.[4][5]

In 2017, David A. King authored a review of Gibson's Early Islamic Qiblas in which he cites plagiarism, misconstruction and misunderstanding of his 1990 work on Qibla direction. King also published a review in 2018 entitled "The Petra fallacy - Early mosques do face the Sacred Kaaba in Mecca but Dan Gibson doesn't know how / Comparing historical orientations with modern directions can lead to false results".[6]

King argued that early Muslim Arabs were unable to precisely establish Qiblas when building new mosques until later mathematical developments made precision possible.[2] Further, King wrote, many variations in orientation are better accounted for by regional and local practices, imperfect geography, and folk astronomy. King noted Gibson's inadequate grasp of mathematics, citing Gibson's "spherical polygons" (p. 170) as inexplicable. King summarized his analysis of Gibson's work as an "amateurish, non-scholarly document that is both offensive to Muslims and also an insult to Muslim and Western scholarship."[2] Gibson self-published his response to King on ResearchGate, "Dr. King on the other hand is convinced that the sloppy qiblas actually intended to point: east, west, solstices, sunrises and so forth. I have not come across anything in Islamic religious manuscripts that support these Qiblas. But perhaps in time someone, somewhere will stumble across something that will change our understanding of Qiblas. All I have found so far, is that every Muslim expects the Qibla to point to Masjid Al Harām."[7] Michael Lecker's review of Gibson's Qur'ānic Geography in the Journal of Semitic Studies from 2014, ends with the sentence: "This book’s imaginative writing may have its followers, perhaps even in academic circles. But the study of early Islamic history is better served by small steps, one at a time."[8] Historian Daniel C. Waugh wrote a skeptical review in The Silk Road, in which he asks, "One might well ask, is there anything in this rambling, self-published book that is to be taken seriously?" He points out that Gibson maintains nabataea.net and says that " From the standpoint of scholarly argument though, the book will invite serious criticism, as there are leaps of faith which leave even a non-specialist reader like myself gasping".[9] He continues "That said, there is a lot here which might give us pause. He is certainly not the first to point out the problems in interpreting the relatively few and cryptic references to what we might term “geography” in the Qur’an or the possible contradictions which arise in trying to establish the factual basis for information contained in the hadiths and early Islamic histories, all of which he repeatedly quotes in extenso." The review ends by concluding that whether Gibson is right or wrong, nothing is going to change in belief or practice.

Works

  • Gibson, Dan (2004). The Nabataeans: Builders Of Petra. Xlibris. ISBN 978-1-4134-2734-9. Self-published.
  • ——— (2011). Qur'ānic Geography: A survey and evaluation of the geographical references in the Qur'ān with suggested solutions for various problems and issues'. Vancouver: Independent Scholar's Press. ISBN 978-0-9733642-8-6. Imprint of CanBooks.ca
  • ——— (2017). Early Islamic Qiblas: A survey of mosques built between 1AH/622 C.E. and 263 AH/876 C.E. Vancouver: Independent Scholar's Press. ISBN 978-1-927581-22-3. Imprint of CanBooks.ca
  • ——— (2023). Let the Stones Speak: Archaeology challenges Islam. Saskatoon: Independent Scholar's Press. ISBN 978-1-9275812-3-0. Imprint of CanBooks.ca

References

  1. ^ Gibson, Dan (2023). Let the Stones Speak: Archaeology challenges Islam. Saskatoon: Independent Scholar's Press. ISBN 978-1-9275812-3-0.
  2. ^ a b c King, David (September 2017). "From Petra back to Makka – From "Pibla" back to Qibla". Muslim Heritage.
  3. ^ Gibson, Dan; Doell, Chad; Schumm, Walter (2023). Let The Stones Speak: Archaeology Challenges Islam. Independent Scholars Press. ISBN 978-1-927581-23-0. Retrieved 6 July 2025.
  4. ^ King, David A. (1990). "Science in the Service of Religion: The Case of Islam". Impact of Science on Society. 40 (3): 245–262 – via ResearchGate.
  5. ^ David A King (15 September 2020). "The Petra Fallacy: Early Mosques do face the Sacred Kaaba in Mecca". Muslim Heritage. Retrieved 29 April 2023.
  6. ^ "King: The Petra fallacy The Petra fallacy - Early mosques do face the Sacred Kaaba in Mecca but Dan Gibson doesn't know how / Comparing historical orientations with modern directions can lead to false results". ResearchGate. Retrieved 4 February 2021.
  7. ^ Gibson, Dan (December 2017). "(PDF) Response to David King with attached article from http://muslimheritage.com/article/from-petra-back-to-makka. It basically argues that Dr. King did not challenge the my data nor my research, but simply denies that it could be possible. His original article is attached to the end of this paper, so readers can see what was originally published and released, before be made changes. In 2018 I will release data on over 20 additional mosques, and then I hope to respond again to this paper". ResearchGate. Retrieved 6 July 2025. {{cite web}}: External link in |title= (help)
  8. ^ Lecker, Michael (1 July 2014). "The Qurʾanic Geography: A Survey and Evaluation of the Geographical References in the Qurʾān with Suggested Solutions for Various Problems and Issues". Journal of Semitic Studies. 59 (2): 465–467. doi:10.1093/jss/fgu020.
  9. ^ Waugh, Daniel C. (2012). "Review of: Dan Gibson, Quranic Geography, 2011" (PDF). The Silk Road. 10. Saratoga, CA: Silkroad Foundation: 201.